Multi-billion dollar antitrust / cartel class action lawsuits have been filed in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom alleging price-fixing of rates for airfreight shipping services by dozens of major international airlines

The plaintiffs allege that certain automakers and trade associations conspired in violation of federal and state antitrust and consumer protection laws to prevent virtually identical, but cheaper, new cars from being exported to the United States from Canada, making new vehicle prices higher for U

According to the claims administrator, "Credit Cards" means all United States-issued Visa-, MasterCard-, and Diners Club-branded payment cards that extend to cardholders a line of credit or which require payment of the amount due by a due date

The plaintiffs allege a near industry-wide, price-fixing conspiracy among egg farmers which raised the price of shell eggs and egg products in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act

Complaint alleges that the defendants, Johnson & Johnson, Inc. (“J&J”), and its subsidiary Ethicon, Inc. are the dominant manufacturer and sellers of sutures in the United States

This is an antitrust class action charging the principal United States manufacturers of high quality float glass used for construction and architectural applications with price fixing in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act

From at least January 1, 1996 through December 31, 2006, Plaintiffs allege that defendants operated a cartel, the purpose of which was to raise, fix, and stabilize the prices of Thin-Film Transistor Liquid Crystal Displays (TFT-LCDs or flat panels)

The plaintiffs allege a conspiracy among Defendants to refuse to compete for the purchase of raw Grade A milk produced, marketed, and processed in the Northeast United States; to restrict farmers’ access to raw Grade A milk bottling plants; to eliminate and stifle competition from cooperatives and Grade A milk bottlers; and other unlawful activities designed to artificially and anti-competitively fix, stabilize, and depress the prices paid for raw Grade A milk purchased from Plaintiffs and other members of the class at levels substantially below the amount they would receive in a competitive marketplace, all in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act of 1890

The plaintiffs allege that there was an agreement to allocate customers and territories, and an agreement not to compete that involved the defendants The Home City Ice Company, Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc

Plaintiffs allege that, between May 1, 2002 and April 17, 2008, Defendants conspired to illegally fix the prices for the sea transportation of goods or persons between Puerto Rico and the continental United States

This is a class action lawsuit that alleges violations of federal antitrust laws in connection with the sale of SRAM. Plaintiff claims that Defendants conspired to fix, raise, maintain or stabilize prices of SRAM

The plaintiffs allege that the defendants and their alleged co-conspirators violated the antitrust laws by unlawfully conspiring to monopolize and to eliminate competition for the marketing, sale, and purchase of raw Grade A milk in the Southeast and to fix and suppress prices lower than they would have been in a competitive market

All persons and entities who purchased polyether polyols, monomeric or polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (“MDI”), and/or toluene diisocyanate (“TDI”), whether sold separately or in a combined form with or without other chemicals added thereto (collectively, “Products”), directly from any Defendant at any time from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2004, (“the Class Period”) in the United States and its territories or for delivery in the United States and its territories (excluding all governmental entities, any defendants, their employees, and their respective parents, subsidiaries and affiliates)